雅思阅读真题(Part 3)

Science in the kitchen

厨房里的科学:分子美食学与名厨实验

本篇也叫:分子美食、分子料理、厨房里的科学、分子美食学、厨房科学、分子烹饪

Part 3 · 考频:中频 · 最近考试:2026.3.28

本篇为雅思阅读真题(Part 3)《Science in the kitchen》,共 14 题,2026.3.28雅思考试真题回忆,页面提供完整原文、题目、答案与解析,并支持在线机考模式免费练习。本页同时提供 Markdown 版本 供 AI 助手与搜索引擎直接读取。

文章大意

文章讲厨师与科学家合作,用化学和物理原理改造烹饪,即分子美食学。法国Hervé This测试并推翻煮菜旧说法,英国物理学家Peter Barham批评菜谱不严谨,并与名厨Heston Blumenthal及其餐厅The Fat Duck合作,用实验和精确标准做菜。

题目原文

Chefs are bringing a new standard of experimentation and precision to their cooking

 

A 

There is a recent movement in the world of food, in which chefs are collaborating with scientists to teach themselves the chemistry and physics of cuisine. Even academics are getting excited about the results. Colin Osborne of the Royal Society of Chemistry in London is enthused: 'Chefs are using unusual methods to produce exciting dishes that would be impossible without modern science,' he says.

 

B 

You may wonder what's wrong with long-established culinary traditions. The fact is, many culturally ingrained cooking methods are less than perfect. Osborne gives the example of the common belief that frying meat seals in moisture, while researchers who weighed the meat actually found that moisture is lost in the process. Another example is the age-old technique of adding salt when boiling vegetables to raise the water's boiling point, thus cooking the vegetables faster. In fact, the amount of salt typically added does not raise the temperature significantly or improve the flavour, since only a minuscule amount is absorbed.

 

C 

Hervé This, director of the Molecular Gastronomy team at the French National Institute for Agricultural Research, spends much of his time trying to disprove culinary old wives' tales. He is empirically testing traditional beliefs about cooking and disproving the more absurd, tackling such questions as whether it's better to add vinaigrette to potato salad while the potatoes are still hot. 'The first modern chemists used kitchen equipment to do their experiments,' Hervé This explains. 'Since then, chemistry has undergone massive changes - but cooking methods have remained largely as they were in the Middle Ages.'

 

D 

It's seriously important work, says Peter Barham, a physicist at Bristol University. 'If you understand what's going on in cooking, you'll be better equipped to improve it.' Barham contends that it's difficult to get good results from cookery books, because recipes are typically poorly written. In stark contrast, he notes, scientific papers are subject to peer review, whereby experts pore over experiments to ensure they can be accurately reproduced.

 

E 

Barham also collaborates with leading British chef Heston Blumenthal, proprietor of The Fat Duck, a restaurant in the south of England. The restaurant is widely regarded as one of the best in the world, serving delightfully unexpected dishes such as nitro-scrambled egg and bacon ice cream. When Simon Campbell of the Royal Society of Chemistry bestowed an honorary fellowship on Blumenthal for creative applications of science to cooking, he said: 'The scientific community admires and respects the research that Mr Blumenthal has performed to harness cuisine to science. Through his inquisitive and innovative approach to food he has underlined spectacularly how chemistry permeates all aspects of texture, taste and smell.'

 

F 

Although some dishes sound gimmicky, this innovative approach to cooking is paying off. El Bulli in Catalonia, Spain - directed by chef Ferran Adrià - is another leading restaurant enthusiastically engaging with science. It's only open for six months of the year (to allow six months for research and development), yet is rumoured to be booked out for an entire year in advance.

 

G 

Such restaurants are part of the movement known as 'molecular gastronomy', an expression coined by physicist Nicholas Kurti, working in collaboration with Hervé This. Kurti once quipped that it is a sad reflection that we know the temperature inside the stars better than the temperature inside a soufflé.* Kurti and Hervé This devised the expression 'molecular gastronomy' during the 1980s to denote the science of 'culinary transformations and eating phenomena' and differentiate it from food science.

 

H 

'Twenty years ago the worlds of science and cooking were neatly compartmentalised,' agrees author Harold McGee, a top food science writer. 'There was food science: an applied science mainly concerned with understanding the materials and process of industrial manufacturing. And there was the world of domestic and restaurant cooking, traditional crafts that had never attracted much scientific attention.' A lot has changed in the two decades since he published his influential book on the topic. In a revised edition, McGee says the book was 'riding a rising wave of general interest in food, a wave that grew and grew, and knocked down the barriers between science and cooking, especially in the last decade. Science has found its way into the kitchen, and cooking into laboratories."

 

I 

So what does the future hold? Rachel Edwards-Stuart is a graduate PhD student who is studying some remarkable food additives, including modified cellulose gels that solidify on heating and melt again as they are cooled. The idea is to make dishes that develop different flavours as they are eaten. Her other project is creating drinks that change flavour. 'The concept came from... Roald Dahl's children's book Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, where Willy Wonka makes a bubble gum that is a whole meal in one sweet,' she says.

 

J 

Unfortunately, Edwards-Stuart was unable to say more, due to a confidentiality agreement with the restaurant for which she conducts her research. While Hervé This, Blumenthal and Edwards-Stuart are the pioneers, the next phase will be to bring science into kitchens at home. Already there are books that provide an insight into the wondrous chemistry that turns humble ingredients into cuisine. And as the movement grows it will not be long before we see laboratory test tubes, flasks and maybe the odd centrifuge on sale next to carving knives, rolling pins and pressure cookers. 

想在线练习这套卷子?进入机考练习

题目与答案

  1. 27 Scientists and chefs have a long-established history of working together.
    • YES
    • NO
    • NOT GIVEN

    答案:NOT GIVEN

    原文定位:There is a recent movement in the world of food, in which chefs are collaborating with scientists

    同义替换:「working together」↔「collaborating」,「long-established history」↔「recent movement」

  2. 28 Traditional ways of cooking tend to be supported by modern scientific research.
    • YES
    • NO
    • NOT GIVEN

    答案:NO

    原文定位:many culturally ingrained cooking methods are less than perfect

    同义替换:「Traditional」↔「culturally ingrained」,「ways of」↔「methods」,「supported by modern scientific research」↔「less than perfect」

  3. 29 The food produced by Heston Blumenthal at The Fat Duck is unconventional.
    • YES
    • NO
    • NOT GIVEN

    答案:YES

    原文定位:serving delightfully unexpected dishes such as nitro-scrambled egg and bacon ice cream

    同义替换:「unconventional」↔「unexpected」

  4. 30 El Bulli is the most popular restaurant of its kind in Spain.
    • YES
    • NO
    • NOT GIVEN

    答案:NOT GIVEN

    原文定位:El Bulli in Catalonia, Spain - directed by chef Ferran Adrià - is another leading restaurant enthusiastically engaging with science. It's only open for six months of the year (to allow six months for research and development), yet is rumoured to be booked out for an entire year in advance

  5. 31 McGee has plans to open his own restaurant.
    • YES
    • NO
    • NOT GIVEN

    答案:NOT GIVEN

    原文定位:author Harold McGee, a top food science writer

  6. 32 The purpose of Hervé This’s research is to
    • determine how chemistry has influenced modern cooking.
    • provide a scientific basis for traditional cooking methods.
    • show that long-held beliefs about cooking are wrong.
    • offer practical advice to those who cook at home.

    答案:show that long-held beliefs about cooking are wrong.

    原文定位:spends much of his time trying to disprove culinary old wives' tales

    同义替换:「beliefs」↔「old wives' tales」,「wrong」↔「disprove」

  7. 33 According to Peter Barham, one difference between cookery books and scientific papers is that
    • scientific papers are checked by more people.
    • the writers of cookery books need not be qualified.
    • the language used in scientific papers is more complicated.
    • recipe writers can profit more financially than scientific writers.

    答案:scientific papers are checked by more people.

    原文定位:scientific papers are subject to peer review, whereby experts pore over experiments to ensure they can be accurately reproduced

    同义替换:「checked」↔「pore over」,「people」↔「peer」

  8. 34 Nicholas Kurti referred to a soufflé in order to
    • give an example of a dish that can easily be ruined by excess heat.
    • highlight the inadequacy of scientific research into cooking.
    • show that cooking is similar to other scientific processes.
    • confess his own limitations as a cook.

    答案:give an example of a dish that can easily be ruined by excess heat.

    原文定位:we know the temperature inside the stars better than the temperature inside a soufflé

    同义替换:「scientific research into」↔「know」

  9. 35 One aspect of Rachel Edwards-Stuart’s research involves
    • matching solid food to complementary liquids.
    • determining which tastes appeal to young people.
    • studying how food changes form in certain conditions.
    • evaluating the risk of damage from using preservatives in food.

    答案:studying how food changes form in certain conditions.

    原文定位:studying some remarkable food additives, including modified cellulose gels that solidify on heating and melt again as they are cooled

  10. Colin Osborne explains that
    • there used to be a clear division between cooking and science.
    • well-established cooking traditions have come back into fashion.
    • cooking has failed to keep pace with scientific developments.
    • an imaginary invention inspired scientific research.
    • science has helped cooks make meals that would otherwise be unachievable.
    • an award was given to acknowledge work in scientific gastronomy.

    答案:science has helped cooks make meals that would otherwise be unachievable.

    原文定位:Chefs are using unusual methods to produce exciting dishes that would be impossible without modern science

    同义替换:「unachievable」↔「impossible」,「otherwise」↔「without」

  11. Hervé This’s research has led him to the view that
    • there used to be a clear division between cooking and science.
    • well-established cooking traditions have come back into fashion.
    • cooking has failed to keep pace with scientific developments.
    • an imaginary invention inspired scientific research.
    • science has helped cooks make meals that would otherwise be unachievable.
    • an award was given to acknowledge work in scientific gastronomy.

    答案:cooking has failed to keep pace with scientific developments.

    原文定位:chemistry has undergone massive changes - but cooking methods have remained largely as they were in the Middle Ages

    同义替换:「keep pace with」↔「remained」

  12. Thanks to the joint effort of Nicholas Kurti and Hervé This
    • there used to be a clear division between cooking and science.
    • well-established cooking traditions have come back into fashion.
    • cooking has failed to keep pace with scientific developments.
    • an imaginary invention inspired scientific research.
    • science has helped cooks make meals that would otherwise be unachievable.
    • an award was given to acknowledge work in scientific gastronomy.

    答案:there is new terminology to describe the study of culinary reactions.

    原文定位:Kurti and Hervé This devised the expression 'molecular gastronomy' during the 1980s to denote the science of 'culinary transformations and eating phenomena' and differentiate it from food science

    同义替换:「terminology」↔「expression」,「reactions」↔「transformations」

  13. Food writer Harold McGee says that
    • there used to be a clear division between cooking and science.
    • well-established cooking traditions have come back into fashion.
    • cooking has failed to keep pace with scientific developments.
    • an imaginary invention inspired scientific research.
    • science has helped cooks make meals that would otherwise be unachievable.
    • an award was given to acknowledge work in scientific gastronomy.

    答案:there used to be a clear division between cooking and science.

    原文定位:Although some dishes sound gimmicky, this innovative approach to cooking is paying off

  14. Rachel Edwards-Stuart gives an example of a case where
    • there used to be a clear division between cooking and science.
    • well-established cooking traditions have come back into fashion.
    • cooking has failed to keep pace with scientific developments.
    • an imaginary invention inspired scientific research.
    • science has helped cooks make meals that would otherwise be unachievable.
    • an award was given to acknowledge work in scientific gastronomy.

    答案:an imaginary invention inspired scientific research.

    原文定位:The concept came from;Roald Dahl's children's book Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, where Willy Wonka makes a bubble gum that is a whole meal in one sweet

    同义替换:「imaginary invention」↔「concept」

相关雅思阅读真题

去机考系统练习这篇真题 →